Відео

Edgar Casey said a thought is a thing, in modern words a thought is a bit (quantum). There is a most likely future influenced by the limited free will of many individuals.

With precognition it is important to make a difference between accessing memory from self or from others and the benefit to self and others. In general the term memory is important in many fields of this type discussion.

Love this! Thank You.

Very good interview, even though he kept interrupting her and tried to control the interview. After watching dozens and dozens and dozens of videos and documentaries on NDE's, I must say that the things experienced out of body, that solidifies the reality, for me, is when the experiencers talk about detailed conversations their loved ones were having way down the hall, that were later verified. I remember one experience, this woman said, as she was leaving the hospital, in her out-of-body experience, that she saw a shoe on the roof, which was later verified, and it should also be noted, that women stayed in a room on the other side of the hospital, so no way she saw it from her window. Experiences like these, and so many more, leave me speechless and 100% sure of the velocity of said experiences.

Try singing *HU* daily, to safely alter personal frequencies. Search how to sing *HU* .

My firsts cpus were made by this guy, among others, 8086 and z80. Its quite exciting seeing him talking about conscience. Really, we grew used to technology and determinism, fearing things apart that. However, quantum technology today isn't efficient like the one found in plants, so if nature did that for plants, ...

The brain is not only a complex "biochemical" machine, it is also a transmitter and receiver antenna of realities that go far beyond physical reality. The brain is part of a "hyperrealistic metauniverse" it is part of this complex interdimensional mirror and a universal cosmic program of life, not only on this planet. The brain is one more piece of that complex mirror of the cosmic fractal hologram. Our consciousness is also part of that universe that is out there, it is part of the universe.

The age of the search to prove God 🙏

This is Gold

❤❤❤

Great work ! Two of my greatest heroes on one table.

54:23 "How can your theory lead to breakthrough technologies?" "Why...?" "I think this theory (leads?) to better people, people that can live together better, they have more fun, they can know themselves." "...cooperate instead of competing." *Soul Travel* is a "technology" as taught by the Mahanta, the Living ECK Master to accomplish the above and more. It requires no equipment other than the equipment we already have: the human package...perhaps it works by a process of subtraction: letting go of limitations of mind and emotions, returning closer and closer to pure consciousness?

1:00 "Consciousness is a quantum field. The body is a structure in space and time that is quantum and classical." 1:58 "One wants to know Itself. So we are fields created by one, to know Itself." The easy way to know oneself: Sing *HU* daily to safely alter personal frequencies. Search how to sing *HU* . "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibrations."- Nikola Tesla.

Indeed, consciousness is fundamental and quantum measurement/observation is secondary. This implies 'cosmic consciousness' as the ultimate fundamental state from which everything emerges.

The big bang theory would suggest a creator of some kind, yes? If no, then why? If we disprove the big bang theory, then it would suggest a simulation, yes? But not only that, what created the simulation? Our meaning (if any) is to procreate and experience as much as possible. Some say we're all the same consciousness experiencing everything possible and that this is heaven, or the equivalent. Others say that life is meaningless and and when we die, that's it. I find that extremely negative and believe the simple things in life actually teach us why we're here. Loved this discussion.

More in-depth

It's not proving anything but still soothing that someone, himself so well acknowledged with computers, thinks we are not really computers while the many, without any hard science degree, are deeply convicted we are and whatever Federico says, won't change that.

If nothing else the AI generated voice 'interviewer' demonstrates the difference between the human experience and that of a computer. No qualia there! This man has developed a very important theory that explains why emotion and consciousness experience are indescribable outside of the realm of consciousness. I've not read his book yet but will do so. His humanity inspires and his ideas along with those of Iain McGilchrist and Roger Penrose lead the way to a new vision of life and its meaning. Let's make a better world than the spiritually impoverished one we've inherited

All thoughts have a 'pre-thought'. It's like your brain is saying: "Is this what you want to do? You have a fraction of a second to change things. You can still do it, or you can finish the thought. This all happens in about 1.30th of a second. About the same as a movie frame.

Wasn't Heidegger's main work "Being and Time" about the same?

Microprocessors, soc, deep chilled quantum computers will never be able to experience “qualia” . Because like the great minds have said, consciousness is non computational. It also appears that consciousness may be an exclusively complex organic phenomenon. Encoded within the fabric of what know to be reality. We may not have access to it.. No sudo here.

People laugh at me when I say that the best times of my life have been the times when I am waking up after a general anaesthetic. I always feel the most sublime peace , love and comfort. It feels like a perfect state of consciousness without the heaviness of a physical body, thoughts and feelings.

I’m loving the discussion but I must say that ads every 7 minutes are quite distracting

💫👁I got the book and it's amazing, I recommend it to anyone who is watching this video. It's understandable without any scientific background. It gives a comprehensive history of scientific developments that have lead to the view that consciousness is a product of the brain that is understandable on 'how we got to here'. Federico gives his own insights on consciousness and free will as fundamental properties of existence in the context of our knowledge of quantum physics. The book is scientifically grounded, but ultimately it reads to me as a deeply spiritual book. In Tibetan Bön and Buddhism, the path follows the steps of View, Meditation, Action and Fruition, where in some paths, view is the most important foundation, and involves understanding the nature of yourself and all existence. This book is very much about establishing the view that we live in a non-dual existence and universe as the wisdom traditions have always been saying, ( and Federico acknowledges ). Federico shares his personal experience of awakening, and how that experience and his understanding that free will and consciousness are fundamental properties of all existence, and that we ourselves, are conscious fields inhabiting bodies, not our bodies themselves, and therefore will continue to exist after bodily death. Beyond the view, Federico shares, how living with it has enriches his life, as it restores meaning and purpose to ourselves and our existence, stripped away by the materialst view of the universe. I can't encourage the book more, for anyone who is scientifically interested, spiritually oriented, is interested or concerned about AI and computer consciousness ( a big part of the book ), or wonders about the big questions about the meaning of life, existence, purpose, and whether we have our own agency and free will, or are living out a predetermined existence. I would like to find a place a to have a discussion forum around the book, but for now am so glad to see a lot of interest in these ideas here. Once anyone has given it a read, please share your thoughts here, I'm very eager to talk about it with other people interested in these ideas.

Gülün adi Rose n cross

I like smell of mold musty scent in natural environment with high humidity. Once I was looking at a photo it was rainy place I felt smell of mold that musty scent Did you get what I meant 😊

Nicola Tesla was well aware of this knowing,but he was gaged to keep this knowing hushed,

In minute 28 he asks a very powerful question. When we perceive things and the electromagnetic inputs grts to our brains "who is seeing?". Who is having that phenomenological experience?

The atoms you made of are alive ,the most powerful atoms a man makes are called sperm ,keep them in, and become your most powerful being,

Thank God for this man… the guaranteed way to eliminate the human race is to think that a machine/computer could EVER have a soul or consciousness

What i find so fascinating is that there's something instead of nothing. How come?

Seems like higher dimensions are defined by the loss of axis and therefore quaila like time and space.

I just asked my future self for an explanation for all of this so I am waiting to receive news 😅

To Waste Existence I wonder, what shall become waste within human entities? As, said entities seek simplistic existence, what shall such, attempt to be? What shall become of thee? For, I wonder is waste, tethered to that of reality? Does that which the human create, simply exist as, waste? For, I wonder, does the simplicity of an artificial existence, lead only to senseless accumulation? To the human, existing absent why, whilst tethering oneself to creation. For, in truth, may we simply be beings of nature? To take oneself from such, may not only disrupt, but, of course, irrevocably alter the way which the human seeks. For, that which exist as artificial, in truth, simply externalizes that of the organism. Meaning, it would seem the human, simply seeks, itself. Rationalizing ways to exist tethered to the human, whilst claiming said existence is tethered to externalities. For, that of competition, is a simple internal existence, relating to that of the organisms, reproductive intention. For, each entity exist tethered to "Winning". Being, that which exist as a zygote. The forming of an entity, now tethered to being. Tethered, to the simplicity of, that which exist as, existence itself. That of replication. That which drives survival, and, procreation. Simply to exist, externally. To be that which is simply able to be. For, within that of competition, as it relates to the external. There seems to be three forms which, human entities continously exist tethered. The first, I would simply deem, "Full Cycle". Within that of the "Full Cycle", that which represents the phallic system takes the form of, the arm, the leg, the club, the bat, the hockey stick. Each existing tethered to, that of a deliver system. That which propels, semen as it attempts to reach the egg. Such an existence is represented, within that of the, ball, the goal, the net. The moment where procreation is actualized, and, existence begins. The second form of externalizing internal reproductive intention, one deems simply, the "Race" stage. Within such, there is only a race to exist as number one. The simplicity of being first. Such an existence is plainly seen within, of course, racing. That of nascar, track. That of, swimming, a marathon. Each existing tethered to the simplicity of being dynamic beings, seeking only to be first. To be that which moves, simply to be that which, exist. The third stage of externalizing, that which exist as internal, relating to that of the organism. Is, of course, existence itself. Within, that of the "Existence" stage, said organism seeks simplistic violence. For, there can only the one. One tethered to being. One able to exist, within, that of the egg. Such an existence was seen plainly in the, coliseum. Where as, gladiators fought to be beings. To be that which, draws breath. To be tethered to, existence. Of course one sees such, within, that of, fighting. That of war, the simplicity of conflict. Each and every combat situation essentially exist in such a way. As to create, the simplicity, of existence. I wonder, since such is tethered to actuality, what truly does the human, create? How is such an existence not tethered to waste, if, within such, be not, even a human mind? Not even the ability to exist as such a kind. For, of course, each human entity tethered to creating such realities, knew not of, why. For, all deem such to be apart of, human life. To be, that which matters. But, of course, such could never matter. Could never be, that which one deems, not only substantive, but, tethered to that of rationality. For, I deem all that exist, absent a mind. Absent, simplistic contemplation leading to immense comprehension, to be tethered to, nothing. Nothing but, uselessness. Nothing but, senseless ascension. Nothing but, a, wasteful, existence...

👍 very well said

I’ve been saying this forever.

Carl could have save a bit of time and read Hegel's dialectics of the soul

Computer can not know GOD, because is not part of GOD, it's of this physical world it's energy electrical signals and atoms it dies here. The conscious is created by the wil of GOD. The human consciousness isn't powered by anything it's alive it is willed by GOD therefore it is and always will be.

Always have respect for self-reflective Christians. Not enough of those in the world. Its the Christian at their most Christian.

The mind, not brain, is synonymous with consciousness. The mind/consciousness is eternal.

I heard it said that 'consciousness is the quantum result of movement of data'. Sounds good to me and as we are all part of the universe and all that is going on there then that whole mass must experience a totality of all the consciousness in it. I believe that would be 'the mind of God' and would mean it is all one sentiency.

A lonely rock in space-time all alone no observer can perceive. Does it exist? No 'matter' what 'nothing' can take away the fact that the rock must be aware of it's own existence...

Mr fagginnnnnn

Faggin on LSD ;) (but seriously, I suspect it's actually a perfectly rational affirmation of religious tenets to validate the afterlife) Big respect for the 4004! I consider every hour spent learning 8086 assembly language golden. Intel 4004 (1971) 4-bit processor with a simple instruction set (46 instructions). Basic arithmetic, logic, control, and memory operations. No support for string or advanced instructions. Intel 8008 (1972) 8-bit processor with an extended instruction set compared to the 4004. Basic operations similar to the 4004 but with more addressing modes and instructions. Instructions include basic arithmetic, logic, jumps, and control operations. Intel 8080 (1974) 8-bit processor with a more powerful and versatile instruction set. New instructions: IN, OUT (for I/O operations), DAA (decimal adjust), and more sophisticated branching and control instructions. Intel 8085 (1976) Enhanced 8080 with additional instructions and features. New instructions: SIM (Set Interrupt Mask), RIM (Read Interrupt Mask), and additional I/O and control instructions. Integrated clock generator and support for single +5V power supply. Intel 8086/8088 (1978/1979) 16-bit processor with a significantly expanded instruction set. Introduction of string instructions: MOVS, LODS, STOS, SCAS, CMPS. New instructions for arithmetic and logic operations, data movement, and control. Instructions for multiplication and division: MUL, IMUL, DIV, IDIV. New addressing modes and segment registers for memory management. Intel 80186/80188 (1982) Enhanced 8086 with additional integrated peripherals. New instructions for bit manipulation: BOUND, ENTER, LEAVE, and bit test/set/clear instructions. Extended instruction set for more efficient control and data handling. Intel 80286 (1982) 16-bit processor with improved performance and new features for protected mode. New instructions for protected mode operations: LAR, LSL (Load Access Rights, Load Segment Limit), VERR, VERW (Verify Segment for Read/Write). Additional instructions for memory management and multitasking: ARPL (Adjust RPL), SMSW (Store Machine Status Word), LMSW (Load Machine Status Word). Enhanced control and branching instructions: CALL FAR, JMP FAR, RET FAR.

Thank you for helping me understand Thyself a bit better. Still processing it all. Peace, and love.

It’s almost impossible to argue with a materialist as they come at the issue with a priori “knowledge” that consciousness isn’t actually a thing. They never explain it computers have it or not, they typically say no, which means they intuitively know they are lying to themselves. They differentiate it and talk about it and draw conclusions…..that it’s no different than anything else, but at the same time claim we are different but it’s only physical, so what is IT?

The Buddhist academic Alan Wallace has created a center of consciousness studies and is a huge advocate of the study of introspection - and has demonstrated many of the concepts expressed here - and that people have been “meditating” out of the bounds of time and space for 1500+ years - the body isn’t even “you” and where is this “consciousness” that seems to reside within it!?

7:03 Understand the co existence of the form and the formless. There is order in everything other than Homo sapiens. Because we have to know the life atom or sentient atom or the soul or spirit which is the building block.

Isn't this all information we already knew? I'd like to know where consciousness goes exactly after death? Does it pick up another drone to inhabit or merges with the source? Is there a choice to keep inhabiting drones or are we forced to continue the cycle?

Federico do be faggin